Case-intake visibility audit · 1 measured check + public research · 1 business day

See where case enquiries are likely to leak before anyone calls back.

Prospective clients find your firm, start an enquiry, and never finish it. It is rarely the marketing — it is usually mechanical, and it never shows up in a monthly report because the enquiry simply never arrives.

$349one-time · USD · no subscription
Delivered by email within one business day
30-day money-back guarantee if it does not show three fixable issues
No call, no retainer, no enrolment in anything
case-intake-visibility-audit.pdfIllustrative sample

Case-Intake Visibility Audit — Harborview Legal LLP

Synthetic example · 8 areas · Ranked by likely effect on enquiries
What each section rests on
Speed (mobile)measured
Contact routesresearched
Click-to-callresearched
Mobile experienceresearched
Enquiry formresearched
Practice-area pagesresearched
Security & emailresearched
Local visibilityresearched
Executive summary
The firm’s phone number is the likely weak point. In the pages public search returns, it appears only inside the header image, so a prospective client on a phone probably cannot tap to call. Speed, the one area measured directly, compounds it: the URL supplied scores 41/100 on mobile, with Largest Contentful Paint at 4.9s. None of this shows up in a marketing report, because an enquiry that never starts is never recorded.
Prioritised findings
HIGHFirm phone number not found as tappable text (researched)
Evidence
Search results for the firm show the number only in a header image; no page returned shows it as text.
Impact
Legal enquiries skew heavily to phone and to mobile. A number that cannot be tapped adds friction at the moment of highest intent.
Action
Check every page template. Render the number as text inside <a href="tel:+1...">.
MEDIUMMobile LCP of 4.9s on the URL supplied (measured)
Evidence
Google PageSpeed Insights, mobile: performance score 41/100, Largest Contentful Paint 4.9s, Total Blocking Time 820 ms.
Impact
Measured against a 2.5s target. A slow page on a phone loses people before they reach the contact route.
Action
Start with the LCP element and the render-blocking scripts named in the PageSpeed report.
MEDIUMTwo practice areas missing from search results (researched)
Evidence
Searches for the firm’s name with each advertised practice area return pages for four of six areas.
Impact
Prospective clients searching for those services may not find the firm at all.
Action
Check that the two missing practice-area pages exist, are linked from the menu and are not blocked from indexing.
Further findings and the Top 10 action list continue in the full report. Synthetic example, not a real client. In your report only speed is measured; the other sections come from public research and say so.
What you receive

The report is the product. Here is its anatomy.

Every report has the same structure, framed around one question: can someone who already wants to contact your firm actually succeed? Each section says whether it rests on our measurement or on public research.

01

What was measured

Mobile performance of the URL you supply, from Google PageSpeed Insights: performance score, Largest Contentful Paint, First Contentful Paint, Total Blocking Time and layout shift.

02

Executive summary

Two or three paragraphs naming the single largest likely leak, written for a managing partner to read in sixty seconds.

03

Intake-path sections

Contact routes, click-to-call, mobile experience, the enquiry form, practice-area pages, security and email, and local visibility, each labelled measured, researched or best practice.

04

Top 10 action list

One ranked list across the whole intake path, ordered by likely commercial impact.

Scope

Eight areas along the path a prospective client walks.

Only speed is measured by us. The rest is reviewed from public web research by an AI model — we do not submit your forms, load your site on test devices or query your DNS.

01

Speed — measured

Google PageSpeed Insights on mobile, run against the URL you supply at checkout: score, LCP, FCP, Total Blocking Time and layout shift.

02

Contact routes — researched

Whether contact pages, forms and phone numbers can be found from public search, and what stands in the way.

03

Click-to-call — researched

Whether the firm’s number appears as text a phone can dial, as far as public pages show.

04

Mobile experience — researched

Likely friction for someone enquiring from a phone, from what is publicly visible. Not a device test.

05

Enquiry form — researched

What can be seen about the enquiry form on public pages. We do not submit or test your form.

06

Practice-area pages — researched

How practice-area pages are indexed and described in search results.

07

Security and email — researched

Publicly discoverable signals and the checks worth making. This report does not scan your server or query your DNS.

08

Local competitive visibility — researched

How the firm appears against nearby firms in public search results and listings.

09

Cross-ranked priorities

One ordered list across the whole intake path, ranked by likely effect on enquiries.

Why $349

Priced as a decision, not a retainer.

The same method as the general audit — one measurement plus public research — scoped, framed and ranked around one job: the intake path.

Mobile speed measurement (Google PageSpeed Insights)included
Researched review of the public intake pathincluded
Local competitive visibility reviewincluded
Findings ranked by likely effect on enquirieslegal framing
Case-Intake Visibility Audit — everything above$349
What you are not paying for: discovery calls, a proposal, a strategy deck or a monthly retainer. You are paying for one specific document about one specific website, and what to fix first.
Fit

Who this is for, and who it is not for.

A good fit if

  • You are a small or mid-sized law firm with a live website
  • You suspect enquiries are being lost but cannot see where
  • You want one clear answer, not a marketing retainer
  • You or a developer can action a fix list
  • You would rather read a document than sit through a pitch

Not a good fit if

  • You want someone to implement the fixes for you
  • You want ongoing legal marketing consulting
  • You are looking for guaranteed case volume — nobody can sell you that
  • Your site is not live yet
  • You need a manual review of custom case-management software
Honest limitation: this is an automated review of your public intake path. It measures page speed directly and reviews the rest from public information, so it points you to likely leaks and the checks worth making rather than proving each one. It does not submit your forms, it is not legal marketing consulting, it does not implement anything, and it makes no claim about case outcomes or case volume. Where something cannot be verified from outside your site, the report says so instead of guessing.

30-day money-back guarantee

If the report does not identify at least three specific, fixable issues, reply to the delivery email within 30 days for a full refund. No forms, no call. Full terms on the refunds page.

After the audit — entirely optional

The report is complete on its own.

Nothing is held back, and nothing in the report depends on buying anything else. It is a finished document about your site as it stands today.

Websites do drift, though — a plugin update slows a page, a template change breaks a form. If you want the same site re-measured every month so that movement shows up as a number, Website Monitoring is $149/month and can start before your audit, after it, or never. It is a separate product, not an upgrade to this one.

Questions

Before you buy.

How is this different from the $199 Complete Website Audit?

Same method — one live measurement plus public research — but scoped and prioritised around one job: the intake path a prospective client walks. Findings are ranked by likely effect on enquiries rather than generic severity. If you want the general-purpose version instead, the Complete Website Audit is $199.

How fast do I get it?

Within one business day of purchase, by email. If the automatic report cannot be generated, you get an email saying so and Julien sends it personally within one business day.

Do I have to get on a call?

No. The automated audits involve no sales call, no discovery session and no scheduling. You buy a report and you receive a report.

Is this legal advice or legal marketing consulting?

Neither. It is a technical and commercial audit of your website's intake path. It makes no claim about case outcomes and gives no legal advice.

What if my intake path turns out to be fine?

Then the report says so plainly, and the guarantee applies — if it cannot show you three specific fixable issues, you get your money back.

What information do you need from me?

Two things, both collected at checkout: the website to audit and your firm name. The report goes to the email address you use at checkout.

Who is behind this?

Relaycairn, operated by Julien in Vermont, USA. Contact details are on the contact page, and every report is sent from that same monitored address.

Stop guessing which part of intake is losing the enquiry.

One measured check and a researched review of the public intake path, one prioritised report, delivered within one business day. Flat $349 with a 30-day money-back guarantee.